ScholarshipUnionScholarshipUnion Guides
Updated Oct 5, 2026 Official site
Getting started
Overview6m Eligibility10m How to Apply2m Scholarship Amount2m Deadlines9m Success Rate2m FAQ3m
Application
Motivation Letter3m Programme Selection2m Documents9m References9m Interview8m Common Mistakes3m Alternatives6m
After winning
After Selection11m Visa Guide3m Housing2m Living Costs2m During Scholarship10m Self-Funded Option8m
Application

Erasmus Mundus Reference Letters 2027

Who to ask, how to ask them, and the one formatting rule — official letterhead — that causes more rejections than anything else in the Erasmus Mundus application.

How Many References Do You Need?

Most Erasmus Mundus programmes require 2 reference letters. Some require 3. A few accept only 1. The exact number depends entirely on the programme, and it is stated clearly on each programme's application page.

If the programme says 2 references, submit exactly 2. Do not submit 3 thinking it will help — some portals only accept the required number. If the programme says "2–3," submit 3 if you have three strong referees. If you only have 2 strong ones and your third would be mediocre, stick with 2.

Who writes your reference matters far more than how many you have.

Two strong, specific references from people who know your work well will always outperform three generic letters from professors who barely remember your name.

Compared with other scholarships: Fulbright typically requires 3 references. Chevening requires 2. DAAD varies by programme. The Erasmus Mundus standard of 2 is relatively light, which means each letter carries more weight — choose your referees carefully.

Who to Ask: Academic vs. Professional Recommenders

The ideal reference is someone who can speak to your academic ability, intellectual curiosity, and potential for success in a demanding international programme. Here is how to prioritise.

Academic references
Preferred
  • Your thesis/dissertation supervisor
  • A professor who taught you in a course relevant to the programme
  • A research supervisor or lab director
  • A professor you did a project or independent study with
Professional references
Secondary
  • A direct manager or supervisor at work
  • An internship supervisor in a relevant field
  • A mentor from an NGO or research institution
  • Best if they hold a senior position and can speak to your technical skills
The golden rule

Choose someone who knows you well over someone with an impressive title who barely knows you. A heartfelt, detailed letter from an assistant professor who supervised your thesis will always beat a two-paragraph letter from a famous department head who has to look up your name.

If you have been working for several years and your academic contacts are distant, one academic plus one professional reference is a strong combination. If you graduated recently, two academic references are ideal.

The Letterhead Requirement — The Most Common Rejection Reason

This single issue causes more document-based rejections than any other factor in Erasmus Mundus applications.

Reference letters must be on official institutional letterhead. A letter on plain white paper — even if the content is brilliant — may be automatically disqualified because the consortium cannot verify its authenticity. This is not a suggestion; it is a hard requirement for the vast majority of programmes.

What does "official institutional letterhead" actually mean? The letter must be printed on (or formatted with) paper that includes:

  • The institution's official logo — university crest, company logo or organisation emblem in the header.
  • The institution's full name — the department name is a plus but not always required.
  • Official address and contact information — the institution's physical address, phone number and/or website.
  • The referee's signature — a wet (handwritten) signature or an official digital signature. A typed name alone is usually insufficient.
  • The referee's title, position and institutional email — "@university.edu" or "@company.com", not "@gmail.com".

If your referee does not have access to official letterhead (a retired professor, for example), they should ask their former institution for letterhead paper or a digital template. If that is truly impossible, explain the situation in your application and have the referee include as much verifiable institutional information as possible in the letter header.

Advertisement

How to Ask Professors for Recommendations

Asking for a reference letter makes most people anxious. Here is the reality: professors get these requests regularly. What annoys them is not the request itself — it is poorly timed, vague requests that give them nothing to work with. Here is how to do it right.

  1. 1
    Ask early — at least 4 weeks before the deadline

    Professors are busy. Give them at least 4 weeks; 6–8 weeks is better. If you are asking during summer or winter holidays, add extra time — many professors check email less often during breaks. With most 2027-intake deadlines between October 2026 and January 2027, that usually means asking in late summer or early autumn. Asking 3 days before the deadline is disrespectful and will likely get you a rushed letter or a refusal.

  2. 2
    Ask in person or by email

    If you are still at the same institution, ask in person first, then follow up with an email that has all the details. If you have graduated, a well-structured email is perfectly appropriate. Do not ask via social media, text message or a WhatsApp group — keep it professional.

  3. 3
    Provide everything they need

    In your request email, include: the programme name and a brief description; the reference deadline; how the reference will be submitted (direct upload link or a PDF you collect); your updated CV; a draft of your motivation letter so they can align with your narrative; a reminder of specific projects or courses you worked on together; and a note about the letterhead requirement.

Sample email template

Subject: Request for Reference Letter — Erasmus Mundus [Programme Name]

Dear Professor [Last Name],

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to ask if you would be willing to provide a reference letter for my application to [Programme Name], an Erasmus Mundus Joint Master's programme in [field]. The programme is taught across universities in [Country 1, Country 2, Country 3].

I am reaching out to you because of the work we did together on [specific course/project/thesis], which is directly relevant to this programme's focus on [specific topic]. Your perspective on my [specific skill or quality] would be particularly valuable to the selection committee.

The reference deadline is [date]. The programme will send you a direct upload link to your email once I list you as a referee. I have attached my CV and a draft of my motivation letter for your reference.

One important requirement: the letter must be on official university letterhead with your institutional signature. I wanted to mention this in advance so it does not cause any last-minute issues.

I completely understand if you are unable to take this on. Please let me know either way, and I am happy to provide any additional information you might need.

Thank you for your time and for the guidance you provided during [course/project].

Best regards,
[Your Name]

Send a reminder. One week before the deadline, send a polite follow-up email. Do not be embarrassed about reminding them — professors expect it, and many rely on these reminders. A simple "I wanted to gently remind you about the reference letter for [programme], which is due on [date]" is enough.

What Makes a Strong vs. Weak Reference Letter

You cannot control what your referee writes, but you can influence it by choosing the right person and giving them the right information. Here is what selection committees are looking for.

Strong reference letter

  • Specific examples: "In my Advanced Statistics course, [Name] developed an original analysis methodology that I later incorporated into my own research."
  • Describes your intellectual qualities, not just your grades.
  • Explains why you are suited for this specific programme.
  • Addresses your ability to thrive in a multicultural, mobile environment.
  • States clearly "I recommend [Name] without reservation" or a similarly strong endorsement.
  • On official letterhead with full contact information.

Weak reference letter

  • Generic: "I am writing to recommend [Name] for the Erasmus Mundus programme. They were a good student in my class."
  • Lists grades or achievements without context.
  • Does not mention the specific programme at all.
  • Could have been written for any student at any university.
  • Lukewarm endorsement: "I believe [Name] would benefit from this programme."
  • On plain paper with no institutional identification.
Advertisement

Waiving Your Right to View References

Some application portals ask whether you waive your right to see the reference letters. This is common in North American scholarship systems and is increasingly used in European programmes too.

We recommend waiving your right. When a referee knows the applicant will never see the letter, the committee treats it as a more honest assessment; letters written knowing the applicant will read them are perceived as potentially inflated. Waiving signals confidence in your referees and adds credibility to their endorsement.

This only works if you trust your referees. If you have any doubt about whether a referee will write a positive letter, do not ask them — it is better to choose someone you are confident about than to risk a lukewarm or negative letter you cannot see.

How to know if your referee will write a strong letter

Pay attention to their response when you ask. Enthusiastic ("I'd be happy to write a strong letter for you") is a green light. Hesitant ("I can write something, but I'm not sure how much detail I can include") is a warning. "I'm quite busy but I can write something brief" is a polite decline — find someone else. A mediocre letter is worse than no letter at all.

How References Are Submitted

Different programmes use different submission methods. Make sure your referees know which method applies before they start writing.

1. Online reference form
Most common

You enter your referee's email in the portal, which sends them a link to an online form (possibly with structured questions, rating scales and a free-text section). They submit directly and you never see the content. This is the most common method for newer programmes.

2. Direct upload by referee

Like method 1, but the referee uploads a PDF letter through the portal link instead of filling in a form. The letter must still be on official letterhead, and your referee needs to check their email (and spam folder) for the link.

3. Applicant uploads

Your referee gives you the sealed letter (or PDF) and you upload it with your application. Less common, but still used by some programmes. Ideally the letter comes in a sealed envelope (if physical) or is emailed to you as a PDF from the referee's institutional address.

4. Email to consortium

A few older programmes ask referees to email the letter directly to a consortium address. Give your referee the exact email address, the subject line format (if specified) and your application reference number.

Applying to Multiple Programmes with the Same Referees

There is no longer an official limit on how many Erasmus Mundus programmes you can apply to (the old three-programme cap was dropped), so your referees may need to write or submit references for several applications. Here is how to handle that respectfully:

  • Tell them upfront how many programmes you are applying to. Do not surprise them with a second or third request two weeks later.
  • Provide a clear list of all programmes, their deadlines and the submission method for each. A simple table in your email works well.
  • Explain the differences between programmes briefly, so they can tailor the letter slightly for each (if they are willing). Even small adjustments like mentioning the programme name make a difference.
  • Be grateful. Three submissions means three times the work. A sincere thank-you note (or a small gesture of appreciation) goes a long way.

What to Read Next

Advertisement