ScholarshipUnion Guides scholarshipunion.com →
← All Guides

University of Oxford

The Clarendon Handbook

An independent guide to Oxford’s flagship graduate scholarship

Other awards

Automatic merit versus constituency, tick-box, and government schemes.

Rhodes is a separate constituency fight. Weidenfeld needs a tick and a statement. Gates is Cambridge. Chevening is a different portal. Clarendon runs if you simply apply to Oxford on time.

Home / Clarendon / Comparison

Automatic versus extra form

Switch awards. Clarendon is the automatic-merit pot. The others need a separate campaign, a tick, or a different university.

Automatic — no extra form

Apply for a new Oxford Master’s or DPhil by your course December or January funding deadline. Official pages: no additional Clarendon documents and no separate scholarship form. Academic merit and potential only.

Extra form — separate constituency application

Rhodes is not a tick on the Oxford graduate form. You run a constituency competition with its own materials and interviews, usually decided before you are an Oxford applicant. Losing Rhodes does not remove a timely Oxford file from Clarendon.

Extra form — tick plus statement

Weidenfeld-Hoffmann sits on the Oxford form only if you select it in the University of Oxford Scholarships section and upload the extra leadership / home-country statement by the same course funding deadline. You can sit in both the Clarendon pool (automatic) and Weidenfeld (opt-in).

Extra form — Cambridge tick, not Oxford

Gates Cambridge is Cambridge. You tick a box on the Cambridge graduate application and write Gates statements. It is not a Clarendon alternative at Oxford. You can apply to both universities; you cannot hold both awards for the same year in two places.

Extra form — separate government portal

Chevening is a UK-government one-year master’s scheme on its own portal, with work-experience and leadership tests. It does not replace an Oxford funding-deadline application, and it will not consider you for an Oxford DPhil the way Clarendon will.

Planning tool only. Not an Oxford or Clarendon Fund decision. Confirm each scheme on its official site.

Against the other big names

Clarendon is the automatic-merit pot. The others are not.

Applicants treat “Oxford scholarship” as one object. It is not. Clarendon is a university-wide academic merit fund with no separate form. Rhodes is a constituency competition with its own application, interviews, and character criteria, usually decided before you are even an Oxford applicant. Weidenfeld-Hoffmann sits on the Oxford form but only if you tick it and upload an extra statement about leadership and commitment to your country or community.

Gates Cambridge is Cambridge, not Oxford: you tick a box on the Cambridge graduate application and are judged on four criteria that include leadership and a commitment to improving lives. Chevening is a UK-government award for a one-year master’s, applied for on a separate portal, with work-experience and leadership tests and a requirement to apply to UK universities independently.

Side by side

Feature Clarendon Rhodes Weidenfeld-Hoffmann Gates Cambridge Chevening
University Oxford only Oxford only Oxford only Cambridge only Any eligible UK university
How you apply Automatic with the Oxford graduate form Separate constituency application Tick on Oxford form + extra statement Tick on Cambridge graduate form Separate Chevening portal
Selection centre of gravity Academic merit and potential only Character, leadership, energy, intellect Leadership and commitment to home-country impact Four Gates criteria, including civic commitment Leadership, networking, career plan, work experience
Nationality rules All nationalities Must fit a constituency Ordinary-residence / eligible-country rules apply Open to applicants who are not UK citizens (confirm current Gates rules) Eligible Chevening countries only
Degree types Master’s and DPhil, full-time and part-time Oxford graduate degrees as permitted by Rhodes House Listed eligible Oxford courses (often one-year taught) Most Cambridge postgraduate degrees, with official exclusions Typically one-year taught master’s
Extra essay? No Yes — Rhodes materials Yes — Weidenfeld statement Yes — Gates statement(s) Yes — Chevening essays

How to use this in practice

If your strength is a first-class file and a precise research proposal, Clarendon is already running in the background once you hit the course funding deadline. You do not spend October writing a second scholarship personality. You spend it on the Oxford documents.

If you also have a Rhodes constituency, that is a parallel campaign with campus endorsements in many countries and interviews that score energy and character. Winning Rhodes funds Oxford; it is not a Clarendon shortcut, and losing Rhodes does not remove you from Clarendon if your Oxford application was on time.

If your story is leadership and return to a home country, read Weidenfeld-Hoffmann on ox.ac.uk: select it in the University of Oxford Scholarships section and upload the statement by the same December or January course deadline. You can sit in both the Clarendon pool (automatic) and the Weidenfeld pool (opt-in) from one Oxford application.

If you are choosing Cambridge versus Oxford, Gates is the Cambridge analogue only in the shallow sense that a tick sits on the university form. Gates adds leadership and social-commitment criteria that Clarendon officially does not use. You cannot hold both; you can apply to both universities.

If you need a one-year UK master’s with a government brand, Chevening is a different calendar and a different portal. Chevening will not consider you for an Oxford DPhil the way Clarendon will. Many applicants run Chevening and an Oxford funding-deadline application in the same winter; they are not substitutes.

Deeper handbooks on this site: Rhodes, Gates Cambridge, Chevening. Weidenfeld rules: official Oxford Weidenfeld page.